Britain risks throttling a golden goose | 英国会扼杀一只下金蛋的鹅吗? - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

Britain risks throttling a golden goose
英国会扼杀一只下金蛋的鹅吗?

By restricting student visas, the UK is endangering its world-class university sector
限制学生签证会危及英国世界一流大学的收入来源
00:00

The government has targeted international graduate students as part of efforts to reduce net legal migration

Britain’s universities are one of its crown jewels. They are vital to competitiveness, skills and innovation and bring in lucrative export earnings. But this week migration advisers, business leaders and the sector regulator have warned that falling overseas student numbers due to a government clampdown on immigration threaten serious harm to universities, which rely on overseas student fee income. Cutbacks loom; some universities could close. Company bosses say that would undermine a key reason to invest in the UK. For a post-Brexit Britain that has not only pledged to raise domestic skills but must continue to fight globally for capital and talent, this is a huge economic own-goal.

The government has targeted international graduate students as part of efforts to reduce net legal migration from a record 745,000 and 670,000 in the past two years. Such influxes put strain on housing and services, and immigration is back among voters’ top three concerns. The worries, however, are also fanned by the government’s own rhetoric.

The numbers are already set to fall towards more normal long-term levels as big one-off inflows subside — from Ukraine, Afghanistan and Hong Kong, and a post-Covid surge of overseas students when other countries were still closed. Yet restrictions introduced on international graduate visas, barring those on non-research courses from bringing family members, have now contributed to sharp falls in applications. Initial indications are that they are running 57 per cent down on last year.

This means serious belt-tightening since, with fees for domestic students in England frozen for a decade, universities make a £2,500 loss on each one. Income from uncapped international fees has become a vital cross-subsidy.

Critics have claimed the “graduate student route” opened in 2021, allowing students to remain for two years post-degree to seek a permanent job, was being misused as a backdoor immigration route. An investigation by the independent Migration Advisory Committee found no evidence of any deliberate and widespread abuse, and said the scheme was achieving its objectives of maintaining competitiveness and raising education exports. It urged the government not to restrict it further without addressing the funding crisis in higher education.

Tory rightwingers who insist only the “brightest and best” overseas graduate students should be admitted say many are studying outside elite Russell Group universities. Some say Britain has too many universities teaching low value degrees and contraction is merited. But some talented overseas students choose non-elite colleges because their fees are lower. Such institutions often also cater disproportionately for less well-off UK students who, thanks to cutbacks to further education colleges, have little alternative.

The UK should not allow international student numbers, broadly in line with its 2010 market share of global higher education, to drop further. But the lopsided funding model for UK universities that has been allowed to evolve is at breaking point; the workings of financing, student fees and loans need to be rethought. Since Labour may shortly inherit the problem, it needs to set out a more credible vision of its own.

With some multinationals saying this week they have had to rescind offers to foreign graduates because of salary thresholds designed to limit migration, this is also about Britain deciding what kind of country it wants to be. Conservative governments insisted that after “taking back control” of its borders post-Brexit, the country would stand proudly as Global Britain. Many talented foreigners who aspire to study or work in the UK are hearing a different message.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

反对派领袖:叙利亚盟友倒台后,委内瑞拉军方可能抛弃马杜罗

委内瑞拉反对派领袖玛莉亚•科里纳•马查多认为,军方首领担心会遭遇与阿萨德军方同样的命运。

欧洲科技企业家:尽管美国占据主导地位,但欧洲仍可在AI领域获胜

欧洲最成功的科技企业家之一赞斯特罗姆表示,不是每家公司都必须研发出大型语言模型,欧洲企业可以基于美国的AI平台开发应用。

Lex专栏:特鲁多退出为2025年加拿大元奠定了黯淡基调

政治不稳定和美国关税的前景,可能会让加元继续走低。

美国股市是否已经进入泡沫区域?

估值可能有泡沫,但似乎并不疯狂。

比特币矿工囤积比特币以度过利润紧缩期

随着资源竞争加剧,美国上市集团向投资者筹集资金。
1天前

在特朗普“反觉醒”时代中航行的美国金融业

政治战争导致银行在满足欧盟客户要求的同时退出与气候相关的联盟。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×